BMI calculator — your body mass index, and the healthy weight range for your height
Enter your height and weight in metric or imperial. You get your body mass index to one decimal, the WHO category it falls in, and — the part most calculators leave out — the actual weight range that would put you in the normal band at your height. BMI is a screening measure built for populations, not a diagnosis for a person, and this page says plainly where it stops being useful. Nothing you type is uploaded or saved.
- Nothing you type is uploaded or saved
- Works offline
- Screening measure, not a diagnosis
Your measurements
Adult figures only. BMI is read differently for children and teenagers, and it is not used during pregnancy — there is more on both below.
Body mass index
22.5
Normal weight
65.0 kg ÷ (1.7 m)² — Inside the band the WHO describes as normal for adults.
BMI is a population screening measure, not a diagnosis. It is worked out from two numbers and knows nothing else about you.
At 170.0 cm, you would be inside the normal band anywhere between 53.5 kg and 71.9 kg. It is a range rather than a single figure on purpose — every weight inside it reads as normal on this measure, and which part of it suits a particular person is not something a height and a weight can answer.
This page is general information, not medical advice. A doctor is who to ask about your own health, and they can look at things BMI cannot — where the weight sits, blood pressure, blood sugar, your history and your family’s.
The WHO bands for adults
| Underweight | Below 18.5 | |
| Normal weight | 18.5 – 24.9 | |
| Overweight | 25.0 – 29.9 | |
| Obese — class I | 30.0 – 34.9 | |
| Obese — class II | 35.0 – 39.9 | |
| Obese — class III | 40.0 and above |
These are the standard international cut-offs for adults. They are not universal — see the note on Asian populations further down the page.
How it works
- 1
Choose metric or imperial
Centimetres and kilograms, or feet plus inches and pounds. Feet and inches are two separate boxes because nobody thinks of themselves as 5.75 feet tall. Switching the unit converts what you have already typed rather than clearing it, so you can check your own figures in the other system. Both routes end in the same calculation: imperial input is converted to kilograms and metres first, so there is one formula on this page and not two.
- 2
Read the number, and the band it sits in
The index is shown to one decimal place, with the World Health Organization category underneath — underweight, normal, overweight, or one of the three obese classes, labelled with the class number rather than lumped together. The band is decided from the rounded figure you can see, so the number on screen and the label under it can never disagree at a boundary.
- 3
Read the healthy weight range for your height
This is the genuinely useful output, and it is the one most calculators skip. A BMI of 27 on its own tells you very little; "at your height, 56.7 kg to 76.2 kg falls in the normal band" tells you what the number actually means in weight you can put on a scale. It is deliberately a range and not a target: the normal band is roughly twenty kilograms wide for an adult of average height, and any single "ideal weight" pulled out of it is invented precision.
- 4
Take the result to a doctor, not to a diet
BMI is a first-pass screen. It cannot tell muscle from fat, it does not know where on your body the weight sits, and it is not valid for children, during pregnancy, or for the very elderly. If the result surprises you, or sits near a boundary, that is a reason for a conversation with a clinician who can measure the things BMI leaves out — not a reason to act on a number from a web page. This tool deliberately offers no calorie targets, no diet suggestions and no weight-loss plan.
What BMI cannot tell you
BMI is a screening measure designed to describe populations, and it is used on individuals because it is cheap, fast and reproducible — not because it is accurate about any one person. These are the four things it gets wrong often enough that you should know them before you read your own result.
It cannot tell muscle from fat
The formula sees a single weight and has no idea what that weight is made of. A muscular athlete can read as overweight while carrying very little fat, and that result means nothing. Someone with little muscle can read as normal while carrying a great deal of fat, and that result is falsely reassuring. Neither case is unusual.
It does not know where the weight sits
Two people with the same BMI can carry their weight very differently, and the distribution matters. This is why a waist measurement is so often taken alongside BMI rather than instead of it. Nothing on this page can see that difference.
It is not valid for children, pregnancy, or the very elderly
Children and teenagers are read on age-and-sex percentile charts, not against fixed thresholds — which is why there is deliberately no child mode here. During pregnancy the index has no useful meaning. In older adults, lost height and lost muscle push the number in opposite directions and it becomes harder to interpret.
The thresholds are not universal
The bands used here are the standard international ones for adults. The WHO has noted that in many Asian populations health risk starts rising at a lower BMI than those cut-offs suggest, and some health authorities use lower action points — around 23 rather than 25 for overweight is the figure usually discussed. We do not print a specific national guideline number, because those differ by country and are revised. If this applies to you, being in the upper part of the normal band is a reason to ask a doctor, not a clean bill of health.
This page is general information, not medical advice. A doctor is who to ask about your own health, and they can look at things BMI cannot — where the weight sits, blood pressure, blood sugar, your history and your family’s.
Healthy weight by height
The normal band runs from BMI 18.5 to 24.9, so at any given height it becomes a weight range. The last two columns are the weights at which the index reaches 25.0 and 30.0 for that height — the overweight and obese thresholds. Every figure here is produced by the same code that runs the calculator above, so the two cannot disagree. Adults only, and the caveats above apply to every row.
| Height | Normal range (kg) | Normal range (lb) | BMI 25 at | BMI 30 at |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 145 cm4 ft 9.1 in | 38.9 – 52.3 | 86 – 115 | 52.6 kg | 63.1 kg |
| 150 cm4 ft 11.1 in | 41.7 – 56.0 | 92 – 123 | 56.3 kg | 67.5 kg |
| 155 cm5 ft 1 in | 44.5 – 59.8 | 98 – 132 | 60.1 kg | 72.1 kg |
| 160 cm5 ft 3 in | 47.4 – 63.7 | 104 – 140 | 64.0 kg | 76.8 kg |
| 165 cm5 ft 5 in | 50.4 – 67.7 | 111 – 149 | 68.1 kg | 81.7 kg |
| 170 cm5 ft 6.9 in | 53.5 – 71.9 | 118 – 159 | 72.3 kg | 86.7 kg |
| 175 cm5 ft 8.9 in | 56.7 – 76.2 | 125 – 168 | 76.6 kg | 91.9 kg |
| 180 cm5 ft 10.9 in | 60.0 – 80.6 | 132 – 178 | 81.0 kg | 97.2 kg |
| 185 cm6 ft 0.8 in | 63.4 – 85.2 | 140 – 188 | 85.6 kg | 102.7 kg |
| 190 cm6 ft 2.8 in | 66.8 – 89.8 | 147 – 198 | 90.3 kg | 108.3 kg |
| 195 cm6 ft 4.8 in | 70.4 – 94.6 | 155 – 209 | 95.1 kg | 114.1 kg |
Frequently asked questions
What is BMI, and what was it actually designed for?
Body mass index is weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. The formula goes back to the 1830s, when the Belgian statistician Adolphe Quetelet was looking for a simple way to describe how the build of a population is distributed — he was studying groups of people, not patients, and he never proposed it as a measure of an individual’s health. It was picked up as a screening tool much later, in the second half of the twentieth century, and the name "body mass index" belongs to that period rather than to Quetelet. That origin explains both its strength and its weakness in one line: it is a population statistic that people now use one person at a time.
How is the number worked out, and what are the categories?
Kilograms divided by metres squared, and nothing else. If you enter feet, inches and pounds, those are converted to metres and kilograms first — this page does not use the 703 shortcut you see elsewhere, because 703 is a rounded version of the real conversion factor (703.0696…) and it quietly makes the imperial answer disagree with the metric one in the last digit. The WHO bands for adults are: below 18.5 underweight, 18.5 to 24.9 normal, 25.0 to 29.9 overweight, 30.0 to 34.9 obese class I, 35.0 to 39.9 obese class II, and 40.0 or above obese class III. Because those bands are written to one decimal, this calculator rounds your index to one decimal first and then classifies the rounded figure — so a result that displays as 25.0 is always labelled overweight, and never sits next to the word "normal" because the unrounded value happened to be 24.97.
If BMI is so crude, why is it still used everywhere?
Because it is cheap, fast and reproducible, and nothing better shares those three properties. It needs a tape measure and a set of scales, it takes under a minute, two people measuring the same person get the same answer, and it can be collected from millions of people and compared across decades and across countries. Methods that measure body composition directly — DEXA scans, hydrostatic weighing, air displacement — are far more accurate about what your body is made of and are far too slow and expensive to run at population scale. So BMI survives as a screening threshold: a way of deciding who might be worth looking at more closely. It was never meant to be the last measurement anybody takes, and that is the distinction that gets lost when it appears on a personal report as though it were a verdict.
Does BMI tell the difference between muscle and fat?
No, and this is its most-quoted flaw for a good reason. The calculation sees one weight figure; it has no way to know what that weight is made of. Muscle is denser than fat, so a well-trained athlete or a heavy manual worker can land in the overweight band, or even the obese band, while carrying very little fat — for them the number means nothing at all. The reverse is just as real and gets far less attention: somebody with little muscle can sit comfortably inside the normal band while carrying a lot of fat, and a normal BMI can therefore be falsely reassuring. BMI also says nothing about where the weight sits, and waist measurement is the usual companion for that reason. If either of those descriptions sounds like you, the number on this page is not the measurement you should be relying on.
Is BMI valid for children, during pregnancy, or for older adults?
No to all three, and this calculator deliberately does not offer a child mode. Children and teenagers are still growing, and their healthy body composition changes month by month, so paediatric BMI is not read against fixed thresholds at all — it is plotted on percentile charts specific to age and sex, and only a clinician using the right chart for that child can interpret it. During pregnancy, weight gain is expected and the index has no useful meaning; a pre-pregnancy figure is what maternity care normally works from. In older adults it drifts in two directions at once: height is lost as the spine compresses, which pushes the index up on paper without any change in the body, while muscle is lost with age, which means the same index can hide a very different body composition. Building a child mode here would mean printing a fixed threshold where a chart belongs, which would be worse than not offering the feature.
Does the same BMI mean the same thing for everyone?
It does not, and the standard cut-offs on this page come with a widely-noted caveat. The World Health Organization has itself observed that for many Asian populations the risk of conditions like type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease begins rising at a lower BMI than the international thresholds suggest, and a number of health authorities have adopted lower action points as a result — a figure in the region of 23 rather than 25 is the one usually discussed for overweight. We are not printing a specific national guideline number on this page and not attributing one to any particular body: those figures differ between countries, are revised, and a number copied into a web page and left there is exactly the kind of thing that looks authoritative while being out of date. The honest version is the general point. This is a Malaysian site and a great many of our visitors are in exactly the group that caveat is about, so if you are in the upper part of the normal band, treat that as a reason to ask a doctor rather than as a clean bill of health. Body composition at a given BMI also varies with sex, age and ethnicity more broadly, which is a further reason the index is a screen and not an answer.
Why does the page show a weight range instead of an ideal weight?
Because there is no such thing as a single ideal weight, and printing one would be inventing precision the method does not have. The normal band spans BMI 18.5 to 24.9, which for an adult of 1.70 m works out to roughly 53.5 kg to 71.9 kg — a spread of nearly twenty kilograms, all of it equally "normal" by this measure. Which part of that range suits a particular person depends on build, muscle, age and history, none of which the formula knows anything about. A range is also the more useful thing to know in practice: it tells you whether you are inside or outside the band and by how much, without implying that one number in the middle is a goal you have missed. The reference table further down this page gives the same range for a series of heights, computed by the same code that runs the calculator, so the two can never disagree.
Is anything I type uploaded or saved?
No. The calculation is JavaScript running in this tab, there is no server involved at any point, and the page works with the connection off once it has loaded. Your height and weight are not sent anywhere, and unlike some tools on this site this page writes nothing to your browser’s local storage either — the answer takes one sitting, and height and weight are personal enough that keeping them buys nothing. Close the tab and the numbers are gone. The page itself carries advertising, which is a third-party request made when the page loads and is explained in full on our privacy page.